bump :) On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 22:24:42 -0600 Terry Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> I suspect that if body editors could be made just slightly more > flexible it would open up whole new ways of using Leo. It seems they > just need two or three things to make them really flexible. > > - a flag to indicate whether the tree pane should select the body > editor's node then the body editor has is focused. To see an > example of editing bodies without the tree selecting the node you're > editing, see the stickynotes plugin > > - a flag to indicate whether the body editor should track the node > currently selected in the tree > > - it needs to not care about what it's contained in, GUI wise. I > don't know how much work's involved in this. > > I'll try and contribute to things moving in this direction when I have > time, just throwing it out there for others to think on. > > If you could have a body editor edit the node indicated by an UNL, it > would basically be a clone... > > Cheers -Terry > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
