On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:13:35 -0500 Terry Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> bump :) > > On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 22:24:42 -0600 > Terry Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I suspect that if body editors could be made just slightly more > > flexible it would open up whole new ways of using Leo. It seems they > > just need two or three things to make them really flexible. > > > > - a flag to indicate whether the tree pane should select the body > > editor's node then the body editor has is focused. To see an > > example of editing bodies without the tree selecting the node you're > > editing, see the stickynotes plugin Ahem, that should be: - a flag to indicate whether the tree pane should select the body editor's node when the body editor is focused. To see an example of editing bodies without the tree selecting the node you're editing, see the stickynotes plugin > > - a flag to indicate whether the body editor should track the node > > currently selected in the tree > > > > - it needs to not care about what it's contained in, GUI wise. I > > don't know how much work's involved in this. > > > > I'll try and contribute to things moving in this direction when I have > > time, just throwing it out there for others to think on. > > > > If you could have a body editor edit the node indicated by an UNL, it > > would basically be a clone... > > > > Cheers -Terry > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
