On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:09 AM, Sheng <[email protected]> wrote:
> Leo would be an attractive option if not for various obstacles, including > among others the following: > > 1. Doesn't automatically open previously loaded workbooks, or by file > click > * Even when file directly clicked, doesn't open. > * Only opens from File menu. Annoying & inconvenient. > You must set the file association manually, at present. Getting this to happen automatically is a top priority. Hmm. It seems like setting file associations isn't documented anywhere. That's a major hole. We are currently discussing this topic in this thread: Bat file launchers for nightly builds: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/leo-editor/li9ILUWuNAs Anyone want to summarize the results? 2. Same file as node opened in notepad then edited while still open in > Leo doesn't update, even on refresh. > The vim and xemacs plugins do an automatic refresh. It won't be possible to update Leo automagically from scite until you save the file in site. This could be called a bug: please feel free to file a bug report. > 3. Does not open python files in Idle with selection of menu item: File > --> Open With --> Idle > OpenWith:Idle opens a Leo *node*, not a file. However, you could use @edit to put an entire file into a node, and then open the @edit node with Idle. I personally never use Idle, which is probably why OpenWith:Idle isn't very useful. Instead, I use g.pdb. Thanks for your comments. Please feel free to continue this conversation. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en-US. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
