On Sunday, 7 November 2010 15:23:11 UTC+2, Edward K. Ream wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas <*[email protected]* <javascript:>> wrote: > Why the literate part was dumped? >Because LP has a bad reputation. Many people would be turned off by the term. >That reputation may be undeserved, but I don't want to advertise Leo >as *only* an LP editor. >Edward It seems that more that the literate name was dumped. Support for code parts and Doc parts is also disappearing from Leo and it's documentation among other bits of LP that have already gone. I quite like the concept of embedding the documentation inside the code, however, it seems that I can’t do that with Leo anymore. I’m an advocate of write-what-you-code then code-what-you-wrote. Rather than code-and-hope-that-its-right. Leo is turning into just another outlining editor, with scripting. It has lost what drew me to it in the first-place. Quite sad really. Craig -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en-US. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
