On Sunday, 7 November 2010 15:23:11 UTC+2, Edward K. Ream wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas
<*[email protected]* <javascript:>> wrote:
> Why the literate part was dumped?
>Because LP has a bad reputation. Many people would be turned off by the
term.
>That reputation may be undeserved, but I don't want to advertise Leo
>as *only* an LP editor.
>Edward
It seems that more than the literate name was dumped. Support for code
parts and Doc parts is also disappearing from the code and documentation.
I quite like the concept of embedding the documentation inside the code,
however, it seems that I can’t do that with Leo anymore. I’m an advocate
of write-what-you-code then code-what-you-wrote. Rather than
code-and-hope-that-its-right.
Leo is turning into just another outlining editor, with scripting. It has
lost what drew me to it in the first-place.
Quite sad really.
Craig
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en-US.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
