On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Chris George <[email protected]> wrote:
> The explanations for @rst-no-head and @rst-ignore and @rst-ignore-tree > should come before their use in the "Write Your Document" section. > Good catch. I think the thing to do is remove the too-early references. There is no great need to discuss these special headlines right away. This tutorial would benefit from an example toolchain for a writer. How to > actually get an html file that can be loaded into a word processor to > output an .odt or .docx file for example. For most of the purposes that a > programmer would use rst, ie. documentation or a web page, the tutorial > goes far enough. But for those who have different output goals, > highlighting the flexibility that Leo with rst should be a primary goal. > There are literally hundreds of writers in the world for every programmer. > If you want Leo to become popular, this is a critical understanding. IMHO. > Good point, but I think it can be left for the reference. Most of us seem to be agreed that the most important thing is to help newbies use Leo's basic capabilities. That certainly applies to the rst3 command. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
