On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 11:29:19 -0500 "Edward K. Ream" <edream...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Kent Tenney <kten...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >> Whew! I'm glad we're on the same page now :-) > > > Indeed, hate to see fisticuffs on this list [-; > > Yeah, I was about to give you a phone call ;-) > > > Initial test is REALLY exciting, in addition to complete support > > for the 'choices' stuff, the timestamps in uA are persistent ... > > Excellent. What do you mean by "choices stuff"? > > > Amazing stuff Edward. > > Thanks. *That's* the response I was expecting. Hehe. > > It's very satisfying that the code is so much simpler than before. > > At present, I plan only two more changes: > > 1. As discussed previously, pd.find_position_for_relative_unl will be > rewritten to be more flexible when searching for matches between unl's > and the incoming imported outline. This will reduce broken links. I asked a vague question about the status of vc.find_absolute_unl_node and vc.find_position_for_relative_unl the other day, what I meant was, what do they do that g.recursiveUNLFind doesn't? It seems like we have two methods to do the same thing, and I think it's already caused confusion dev. wise, when the smarter bookmarks were being developed and the vc.* commands were updated even though they weren't relevant. Cheers -Terry > 2. The clean-persistence-tree command will remove @data nodes that do > not correspond to any existing foreign file (for now, read @auto > tree). > > Edward > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
