On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 2:16:45 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 8:17 PM, 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor
> <leo-editor@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> ...it may be best simply to require an exact match, and fall back on
creating nodes to hold uA's in case no match is found.
As of the latest rev, pd.find_position_for_relative_unl contains this code.
if 1:
return pd.find_exact_match(root,unl_list)
else:
return pd.find_best_match(root,unl_list)
Given our discussion of ambiguous unl's and restoring unmatched uA's, I
think the simplest thing that could possibly work is to require exact
matches, and to save unmatched uA's somewhere. So the first part of plan
is in place...
Edward
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
