On Monday, September 8, 2014 8:25:49 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 8:39 PM, 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor >
> The major drawback of those is that they use plain plain text editors, > and not Leo body > > editors. free_layout should be able to completely replace the > perennially picky add-editor code, too. > > I would love it if that could be done. But it won't be easy, imo. > On second thought, I think you are right. Much of the "dashed" complexity I was talking about will probably be handled in free_layout itself. The only "extra" thing free_layout has to do in order to manage body panes is to keep the following ivars up to date: c.frame.body.wrapper, c.frame.body.wrapper.widget and (I think) c.frame.body.widget. This last doesn't make a lot of sense, but iirc failure to update it caused the crashes re body editors that Kent reported recently. So it's time for me to re-read your posts ;-) Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
