On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Voice of the (wannabe) User < [email protected]> wrote:
I've spent some time trying to bring Leo's Wikipedia article up to > Wikipedia's perhaps perplexing standards (for those who think Wikipedia a > factual repository - it is, rather, a repository of verifiable claims from > reliable secondary sources). Fully commented edits, click article history. > Many thanks for this work. As you say, it's difficult to know whether your edits will remove some or all of the objections listed at the top of the article, but I think they are great improvement. > > I've added a few inline references to non-Leo, non-blog reliable secondary > sources. That took some digging. There is still a lot of insider, overly > technical factoids in that article that need to be independently sourced or > ripped out, true or not. I'm hoping to add more good references after a > truly well-engineered major release (5.0 or will it be 6.0?) might garner > the attention of computer magazines - e,g,, Linux Journal, PC World, Linux > Magazine, Linux Format, Full Circle, etc. > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_computer_magazines> > There has been a lot of progress in recent days on the installation front. In particular, I am thrilled that "python setup.py install" works--an ancient bug has been fixed. As I understand it, pip install leo will "just work" as well. So afaik all the installation problems you mention have been fixed. I added the licensing info to get the Leo icon on Wikimedia Commons, so > it's out there and now on the Wikipedia page. > Thanks for that. Thinking through the best way way to present a single 5.0 version > screenshot showing the most distinctive layman's feature, an outline with > cloned nodes, in a non-programming context that is meaningful to all likely > to be interested in trying it out for a quick spin. Suggestions welcome, > esp. pointers to exemplars, but I'll be doing this one myself to avoid > becoming infected with what otherwise might be justified Wikipedia conflict > of interest concerns. > Excellent! Thanks for doing this. For me Leo is primarily an alternative to vim, emacs, eclipse, visual studio, etc. I am happy that it has other uses, but it's really ok if not everyone uses it ;-) Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
