On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Segundo Bob <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 03/21/2015 11:06 AM, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > I am likely to kill paste-retaining-clones today or tomorrow. I /might > > /consider reviving paste-retaining-clones later, but only if somebody > > can explain to me why it makes sense and why it's worth the danger. > > > > Your comments, please. > > paste-retaining-clones is how I create clones 99 times out of 100. I do > not look forward to figuring out how to conveniently create clones if > you take away paste-retaining-clones. > > Paste-retaining-clones is conceptually straightforward and natural. > Something is very wrong, if it can't be implemented. > I'll consider retaining this command when the cut and paste happens in the same outline, but I don't see how it makes sense when the paste happens in a different outline from the outline in which the cut/copy happened. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
