While reorganizing Leo's to-do list I realized that clones speed the process significantly. Afaik, bookmarks can not emulate the process I use.
As I explored the to-do list, I created top-level clones of all the nodes I kept coming back to. In this way of working, moving a node was a snap: just move it from one clone to another. Something subtle is going on here. Yes, bookmarks could emulate this workflow. However, the workflow *suggested new topics in the to-do list*. Indeed, the new organization only seems natural in retrospect. There was a significant process of trial and error involved. *The result contains no clones*. The clones were only scaffolding. Each to-do item appears exactly once, in its most appropriate place. I think this discipline is important: it forced me to choose where I actually wanted items. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
