On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:04 AM, <reinhard.engel...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> So it looks like we're stuck. Any ideas? >> > > Apart from using a sophisticated decorator you could just pass the class > name as an optional parameter in > > @cmd(command_name, class_name=None) > > I'm no expert here, but this would require about 150 changes in the Leo > code base and could be done > > by a regex search/replace. > I'd rather stick to per-class decorators rather than add the class name. It's too ugly. This would be the *worst *kind of complexity: something that complicates all uses of the decorator. In contrast, your sophisticated decorator completely encapsulates all the complexity. This is the *best *kind of complexity: something that simplifies the uses of the decorator. Being able to use g.command everywhere will be a big win. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
