On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:13 AM, 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor < [email protected]> wrote:
I must admit that I don't always run the unit tests because sometimes I > know there's no coverage in the area I'm working. But when I do, this > is how I do it: > Thanks for the summary. There seem to be 9-13 failures on my system currently, I don't think > the test environment translates across machines perfectly. True. > It would be > nice if master typically had zero failures on it so you only needed to > run tests post changes and evaluate new failures, but I think it might > be a lot of work to get zero failures on arbitrary systems. > One possibility that I sometimes use is simply to disable a test on Linux. It's good enough, imo, in most cases, simply to have the test pass on Windows. Not the best solution, but it would be ok with me if it were more widely used. EKR -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
