Hi,
Yes, the discussion about longer or shorter names is not fruitful. Is
better to explore some changes, variations and ideas outside of Leo and
see where makes sense bring them back here.
Once live coding become available on Leo, anyone could make something like:
from Leo import c as commander
from Leo import g as globals
from Leo import p as position_selected
or anything that works and suits personal preferences, so such
distinctions become irrelevant.
Cheers,
Offray
On 22/01/17 02:16, Edward K. Ream wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
sometimes one looks his own code and thinks that the future self
would write it, in a complete different fashion.
That often happens with me. But there is no way that I would
consider renaming c, g and p in my own code. Or any other ubiquitous
one-letter name. Imo, longer names are pure cruft.
But this is mostly a preference, and we never argue about
preferences. If you don't like c, g or p, define abbreviations that
create alternatives that you like better:
c;;=commander=c
g;;=globals_module=g
p;;=presently_selected_position=c.p
or:
defs;;=commander,globals,present_pos=c,g,p
Edward
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
