Terry Brown wrote: > > > > > > > *I'm not sure if I understood Lewis's post or not. I wonder if it was a > humorous way of pointing out that Leo already has solutions to most of the > actual problems / workflows that these other tools address. Different > solutions, but no reason to think there's one best solution. [snip]* >
I didn't get my point across, I'll post again later. Yes Leo already does have solutions to most of the actual problems / workflows that these other tools address. > > > > > *But following in the vein of your comments and what I think Lewis was > saying, that's ok - Leo's current UI is good. As a piece of software (the > hidden relationships, perhaps), I think Leo should be (is?) flexible enough > to support multiple editing components.* *Cheers -Terry * > Yes, Leo's UI is good, and Leo's features are quite remarkable. However the UI can maybe improve in small ways. I really liked the panel work <https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21msg/leo-editor/y7y-jquJ8Aw/H2unlW5iCgAJ> you posted. Regards Lewis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
