Thanks, Edward. I have tried using paste-retaining-clones (from the minibuffer, since I wasn't able to find it in any menu), but then all nodes in the copied subtrees are pasted as clones, not just the ones that where clones already. Perhaps I am doing this wrong?
In the attached pic, only the nodes named "child1" should be clones: instead, their parents "root2" have become clones as well. I wish it could be possible to keep the status clone/regular node unchanged for each node when pasting subtrees. The reason is that I use subtrees to store templates that have common parts (the clones) and independent parts that need to be edited differently when I make a new copy of the subtree. Alac On Monday, April 10, 2017 at 8:45:48 PM UTC+9, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 6:21 AM, alacnorr <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> >> I assume (perhaps incorrectly?) that subtrees containing clones among >> their child nodes, once copied and pasted, should retain these child nodes >> as clones; instead, clones are transformed into regular nodes that can be >> modified independently. >> > > Try using paste-retaining-clones after your copy operation. > > At present, paste-retaining-clones issues an error message if you try to > paste between different .leo files. Not sure why, and I'm thinking about > removing that restriction. > > Edward > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
