On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 7:14 AM, Terry Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm not sure refresh - from - disk is immune to these problems. Nothing > specific, sorry, but I feel like I've seen it so some of the headline / > recovered node type stuff. Not sure though. Surely it uses a lot of the > same read code? > Yes. refresh-from-disk just deletes all the children of the root node and then calls the appropriate atFile helper. > Perhaps assessing the differences between @<file> types is important? > I tried to indicate my own uncertainties with parenthetical question. The initial post, and the comments in #505, are merely starting points. Certainly the differences between @<file> types is important, but I suspect that @file is the acid test. I have two new tools at my disposal since writing the code so long ago. One is the principle of "the simplest thing that could possibly work". The other is cff. I am confident that Leo's new read code will be much better than the old. It's worth any amount of effort. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
