I'm not up on the specifics, but folks seem excited about language improvements available in 3.6, at some point in time it will make sense to use those features, resulting in code that won't work on 2.7. The tipping point if not now, near. That's what I meant.
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday, June 20, 2017 at 9:20:42 AM UTC-5, Kent Tenney wrote: >> >> "the simplest thing that could possibly work" >> > > >> always makes me cringe, since it implies a grasp of All Possibilities, >> I settle for a bit of complexity collapse. >> > > Imo, the principle encourages us to avoid complexity, not to imagine all > the complex possibilities! It suggests starting with the simplest thing > that comes to mind, not the most complex. > > >> Considering a re-write of core code sounds exciting, in addition to >> desired >> improvements, opportunity to make core more accessible to hacking by >> non Edward/Terry folk. >> > > I'm afraid that you hope in vain. The read code is never going to be > easy. > > In fact, I plan to change as little as possible of the read code. > > Write to 3.6? It seems we're at the point has been tipped towards it. >> > > I don't understand this. > > Edward > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "leo-editor" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
