On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 17:06:30 -0600 "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Starting afresh, > > No, the project does not start afresh in any sense. There are no new > classes, no new subcommanders. I didn't mean to imply that you had started afresh. I meant that if one were to start afresh, one might arrange things as I went on to describe, but constrained by the need for backwards compatibility, you were trying to move in that direction by moving implementation to other files. I think it's clear enough what's been done. The value I think is in the cleaning up of the namespace, rather than the reduction in size of the definition of the Commands class. Or rather, the cleanup of the namespace is a real improvement, while the reduction in size of the definition of the Commands class kind of irrelevant, since Leo eliminates any of the inconvenience of large source files. Cheers -Terry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
