On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 3:02 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > My 2 cents: the only dependencies that needed to be reported are modules > needed to run Leo on a standard python install. > Thus, in my view, Leo should present itself with a set of plugins that > will work out of the box (i.e. on a standard python/os-install). >
What, exactly, is a "standard python install"? Imo, using Anaconda will save most users a lot of aggravation in the long run. IPython recommends this approach, and I agree. A few extra minutes of download time will repay themselves many times over. On modern machines, the extra space requirements don't matter. Please do not burden Leo's devs with issues relating to a user's unwillingness or inability to install dependencies. I'm not going to have a lot of sympathy for such troubles. Having said that, if a plugin fails to load due to missing dependency, it should clearly report that fact. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
