On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Terry Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm not saying that Anaconda / Miniconda shouldn't be suggested *among* > the options, they just shouldn't be presented as the only option, > just as getting Leo from git shouldn't be the only option. > Perfectly reasonable. I think it comes down to what filter we're trying to apply to incoming > users. Python devs only? Or all comers, even writers ;-) > Imo, the focus should be on making things as simple as possible for non-technical people, such as writers. In fact, I think scientists qualify, in general, as non-technical people, which is why the Anaconda distro makes sense for IPython. It saves a lot of install headaches later. Matt's pip install seems to get Leo running with minimal effort, as > long as you use Python 3. > ... But the important thing is > that it gets Leo running so the user has a chance to see it rather than > just drifting on to something that's easier to install. > That's what we want, surely. Spelling and formatting rst aren't critical to demoing Leo - Leo should > start with nothing more than PyQt, as far as I'm aware. > I agree. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
