On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 10:00:40 -0800 (PST) "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 5. They are settings that do not conflict with the theme's primary > purpose. In particular, they do not alter the theme's basic colors. I don't think this merits argument because it's just a preference of the theme designer. If a theme designer wanted to make variations of a theme by redefining its colors, they should be free to do so. As I said, it's not uncommon to see the same theme released in different colors, like dark_world-green, dark_world-orange, dark_world-red, that kind of thing. That would most easily be done with one CSS and three sets of color settings. I agree a theme should "just work", as distributed. As long as it does, I don't think it matters too much how it's implemented, although some themes may be much easier for users to tweak via settings than others. If a user can't tweak a theme the way they want, they'll look for another theme. So > I shall not approve using css settings that: > > A. can not easily be understood or explained. seems like a good idea > B. modify the fundamental colors of a theme. seems like an unnecessary restriction Cheers -Terry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
