It's interesting to me, anyway. Could you talk about why you haven't found Jupyter notebooks to be satisfactory? On other threads we have been discussing whether Leo, with the Viewrendered3 plugin, might be able to do much of what Jupyter does, and have some advantages besides. Your question seems to fit right in.
On Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 3:57:27 PM UTC-4, Brad wrote: > > Hello All, > > As I see it, one of the more important trends in computational sciences is > reproducibility. I have tried out a number of platforms that attempt to > enable reproducibility and capture the provenance necessary to faithfully > recapitulate computational analyses; however, I found them burdensome in > terms of the imposed workflows. > > I wonder if Leo could be a compelling platform for this use case. > > Is anyone else interested in this use case? > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/f86f9926-0546-4892-9300-9584ed7d8782%40googlegroups.com.
