On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 3:50 AM gar <[email protected]> wrote: > First, I apologies for being too emotional. I do really love vim and do > really love leo so the news that they would never be together made me too > upset. > Secondly, after thinking about the bridge more and more I would probably > accept your point of view. > Making the bridge itself has no practical sense. To be connected with > other editing environments Leo have to provide virtual GUI which then can > use whoever else. > This is very hard task and I dont actually believe it is possible to be > done without full redesign and rewrite of the whole code base. > Otherwise every bridge to so anything would be just another portion of > mess which would got out of sync with every minor release. > > Thank you for this lesson of wisdom, Edward. >
You're welcome. Btw, I didn't perceive any undo "emotion" in your post. There is another potential way forward. At present, Leo's vim.py plugin uses vim's client/server interface. Instead, perhaps vim.py could talk to a python plugin on the neovim side, say leo.py. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS0hm50XDZWCrysz9UipRbY8hE6rZ4ufNWUeKR%2BBzTai%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com.
