On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 9:36 PM Thomas Passin <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm not crazy about bureaucracy, but I have noticed that the PR can lead > to a lot of good discussion, and what gets added in the end may not be > exactly what was in the PR at the start. > Imo, "bureaucracy" is a misleading word. True, PR's require more work. The question is, when is the work justified? As you say, PR's provide a platform for discussion and review. They are typically a permanent record of particular code changes. As we consider Leo without me, I think PR's will help democratize changes. Looking back, a PR for the fast read code that I "borrowed" from Vitalije might have avoided some hard feelings. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS34ub-7WtBQHjgj2a4%2BMD4Zae9EhJxdEjUDWi9NXhjviw%40mail.gmail.com.
