Edward K. Ream schrieb am Montag, 19. Oktober 2020 um 17:07:19 UTC+2: > All issues scheduled for Leo 6.3 have been completed. Expect Leo 6.3 as > scheduled this Friday, October 23. > > Please do not push anything to devel, even if you have do have > administrator rights. > > Please test devel and report any problems immediately. Thanks. >
One thing I noticed when testing ' Leo 6.3-devel' is related to 'LeoPy.leo' vs 'LeoPyRef.leo'. - From my test notes: ### 2020-10-18 ~ 20:45 (UTC) Try to 'Open Specific Leo File (OSLF)' ... * OSFL > CheetSheet.leo - OK. * OSFL > LeoDocs.leo - OK. * OSFL > LeoDist.leo - OK. * OSFL > LeoPy.leo - OK? -> Opens 'LeoPyRef.leo' outline ... * OSFL > LeoPyRef.leo - OK. * OSFL > myLeoSettings.leo - OK. * OSFL > quickstart.leo - OK. * OSFL > scripts.leo - OK. * OSFL > leoSettings.leo - OK. * OSFL > unittest.leo - OK. ### Is this something expected? With kind regards, Viktor PS & FTR: This is the first time (in my environment) that all OSFL items open / succeed w/o complaining about any missing files. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/162a11d3-b4e8-45c2-a500-bc67840a48f8n%40googlegroups.com.
