I'm not saying anything against what you say, not at all. I'm just suggesting that the end result might better be named by a different name, presumably "rst4".
On Saturday, March 27, 2021 at 7:12:28 PM UTC-4 Edward K. Ream wrote: > On Saturday, March 27, 2021 at 4:37:39 PM UTC-5 Edward K. Ream wrote: > > > There are several other costs of doing nothing. Call them "opportunity > costs" if you like: > > In my mind, this isn't a difficult judgment call. Let me explain: > > Leo has had, from very early days, superb capabilities for creating and > changing outlines: think, p.b, p.h, p.gnx, Leo's iterators, and yes, clones. > > So if people want automated ways of creating content, it's dead easy to do > so with scripts and plugins. Instead, I created a horrendous botch of > half-baked options for the rst3 command. That botch must go. It's not a > tough call. > > Edward > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/c39ac138-aad5-48e2-a863-3deec23c2f1en%40googlegroups.com.
