My Sphinx documents use a Sphinx-type table of contents at the top of the 
tree,  a hierarchy of rst files, and inter-file links.  Nothing more 
complicated.  The content includes text, code snippets,  entire small 
programs, output captures formatted as plain mono-spaced text, and images.  
I don't use anything more complex, and until a few days ago  was not aware 
that you could do anything more complicated with rst3.

So when you are done with the revamped rst3, I want to be able to run it on 
my tree and get Sphinx-ready output, just like you can get currently.  If 
that will work, I will be happy.  If it won't, I will probably have to do a 
lot of work to be able to generate my documentation, and I won't like that.

On Saturday, March 27, 2021 at 5:37:39 PM UTC-4 Edward K. Ream wrote:

> On Saturday, March 27, 2021 at 11:52:00 AM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote:
>
> Everything you say you want to achieve could be done by leaving rst3 as is 
>> - never touching it again - and creating a new rst4.  It would be no more 
>> work, and there would be no latent backwards compatibility issues.
>>
>
>  There are costs associated with doing nothing, some of which I've 
> mentioned: learning costs for newbies and maintenance costs.
>
> There are several other costs of doing nothing. Call them "opportunity 
> costs" if you like:
>
> - The design and code of rst3 are poor adverts for Leo. 
> - rst3 leads our thoughts astray. The rst3 command should *handle* 
> content, not *manufacture* content.
> - A clearer view of rst3 will encourage those with advanced needs to write 
> simple scripts to create the content they want.
>
> *Summary*
>
> We must not rationalize past mistakes. Progress happens by learning from 
> those mistakes and moving on.
>
> I've ripped out major projects before. Leo is stronger without Qt docks, 
> and Leo will be stronger with a simplified rst3 command.
>
> Imo, an rst4 command would increase confusion. The rst3 command (and its 
> horrendous docs) would be an ongoing distraction.
>
> I'd like to hear now from those who actually use the "advanced" features 
> of rst3.
>
> Edward
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/2aea72cf-1f9a-4274-952d-2632955f4615n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to