I wrote "code bases".  I actually meant "APIs", and I was thinking along 
the lines of "capabilities"..

On Saturday, July 6, 2024 at 7:12:46 AM UTC-4 Thomas Passin wrote:

> You aren't considering the benefits of custom Python code in adding 
> functionality. I have several Leo-hosted apps I use all the time.  To 
> recreate them in LeoJS, I would have to learn how to do equivalent things 
> in ts/js and VS Code.  I'm not against learning new things but I've already 
> done that once with PyQt and Python.  Now I want to use them, not reinvent 
> them.  I'm sure many others are in the same position.
>
> If you are using LeoJs without writing code for it, then sure, it's great!
>
> The two code bases are sure to diverge in time.  It always happens.
> On Saturday, July 6, 2024 at 6:32:16 AM UTC-4 Inspired Mars wrote:
>
>> (From the other discussion thread that emerged from this one):
>> Ed wrote:
>> >Leo isn't an idea, it's a Python program.
>>
>> That perfectly summarizes why the new product needs to be its own thing 
>> with its own name and destiny.
>> There are zero dependencies between it and Leo.
>> Do you now see how freeing it is to completely separate the two?
>>
>> IMHO, the legacy app ought to be retired as soon as possible. 
>> Seems no reason to have two disparate code bases doing the same thing.
>> In any case new users ought to be spared the cognitive overload of this 
>> (to them) weird clone.
>>
>> On Saturday, July 6, 2024 at 4:31:31 PM UTC+7 Edward K. Ream wrote:
>>
>>> On Friday, July 5, 2024 at 10:24:42 AM UTC-5 Inspired Mars wrote:
>>>
>>> The millions of people that use Visual Studio Code have no idea what 
>>> Leo is.
>>>
>>>
>>> LeoJS will educate them :-)
>>>
>>> Edward
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/d111af92-3661-4f56-8faa-125e59cb652bn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to