On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 8:14 AM Inspired Mars <inspiredm...@gmail.com> wrote:
This thread was about freeing “LeoJS”, but it looks like I waded into an > area that didn’t seem controversial at all. > Namely, that the new product was built to replace the old. > All the past announcements made clear that it was a matter of when, not > if: > These are from memory, not verbatim quotes, but should be close enough. > - LeoJS is the future of Leo > - Such and such is the “final release” of Leo > - The Visual Studio Code team has far far greater resources for building > user interfaces > Etc. > And I suggested (and suggest) that sooner is better than later for reasons > given. > Now it’s being stated that “this isn’t going to happen”. Well exactly what > is being planned then? > If there were ever a time for coy dismissive one liners, that time is long > past. > Why create FUD on this project? > Why build up all this excitement and have sweat poured into building a > replacement and then not believe in it enough to stand solidly behind it? > Make it make sense. > I do not wish to discuss these issues further. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS1wTPQSyijbDKiwf3kZWDZKMH_vQBRPfFbuLoDoeiAkng%40mail.gmail.com.
