On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 9:05 AM Thomas Passin <[email protected]> wrote:
Looking at the test erlang file, I see that the "<< ... >> " syntax seems > to be an essential part. I had at first thought they were symbols that had > not been escaped by the XML ingesting code, but I see that was wrong. I > wonder if the section delineator characters "<< .... >> " could be changed > using a directive, much like the comment character can be changed. Perhaps > that would not be too much of a code change? > Good question. Maybe 20+ years ago Leo had some escapes that roughly did the same thing. One of the best design decisions I ever made was to eliminate those hacks/conventions. There is no way to read @<file> nodes with *any* kind of exception. I'm not going to change my mind about this while I live. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS3k8GC%3DB%3D%2BSvDdE7nxTh1D%2BDGQcoCLcJCNzNMN7QF4AnA%40mail.gmail.com.
