Confirmed! When using "@section-delims [[[ ]]]" the error disappears.
Thank you!

Is there a way and/or place to define this language-specific?

On Monday, September 16, 2024 at 11:05:29 PM UTC+2 [email protected] wrote:

> I tried out the directive and it worked as desired for the sample erlang 
> file.  I specified that the section delimiters would be "[[[...]]]":
>
> @section-delims [[[ ]]]
>
> Edward may think of this as a hack today (as opposed to 20  years ago) but 
> there are good precedents: SQL statements that declare functions need to 
> escape the delimiters if they are to emit a legal SQL statement. SQL has 
> syntax to temporarily change the delimiters so this can be done. One common 
> use is that a ";" by default terminates an SQL statement.  So if you want 
> your function to create but not run this statement:
>
> SELECT 1;
>
> as soon as the processor came to the ";' it would execute the current 
> statement, which is wrong because you are just defining it to be used 
> later.  So:
>
> DELIMITER // -- Parser now looks for "//" to end the current statement
> SELECT 1;  -- The ";" is part of the statement that will be executed later.
> DELIMITER ; -- Return parser behavior to process ";" as usual.
>
> (I've left out other details needed to make this complete function 
> definition, just to make the point).
>
> Here is what the saved erlang @file looks like with the changed section 
> delimiters:
>
> %@+leo-ver=5-thin
> %@+node:tom.20240916163919.1: * @file c:\temp\erlang_name_sections.er
> %@@language erlang
> %@@section-delims [[[ ]]]
>
> %% ErlangTest
>
> -module(erlang_test).
>
> colourize_image(Alpha, {R,G,B}) ->
>     << <<R:8,G:8,B:8,A:8>> || <<A:8,_:8,_:8>> <= Alpha >>.
> %@+[[[ interleave_rgb ]]]
> %@+node:tom.20240916164123.1: ** [[[ interleave_rgb ]]]
> interleave_rgb_and_alpha(RGB, Alpha) ->
>     list_to_binary(
>       lists:zipwith(fun({R, G, B}, A) ->
>     <<R, G, B, A>>
> end,
>     [{R,G,B} || <<R, G, B>> <= RGB],
>     [A || <<A>> <= Alpha])).
> %@-[[[ interleave_rgb ]]]
> %@-leo
>
> So Leo can happily create @file erlang files even when the contain what 
> look like named sections, and you can use named sections within such a 
> file.  Nice work, Edward!
> On Monday, September 16, 2024 at 4:37:49 PM UTC-4 Thomas Passin wrote:
>
>> I didn't phrase that right but it doesn't matter because I just tested 
>> and found that the section reference will be found anywhere in a line.  
>> This agrees with the initial posting. And the sample erlang file has some 
>> "<<...>>" structures that are the first non-whitespace characters in their 
>> lines anyway.
>>
>> On Monday, September 16, 2024 at 2:50:00 PM UTC-4 Thomas Passin wrote:
>>
>>> The section marker has to be at the very left of the current indentation 
>>> level, doesn't it?
>>>
>>> On Monday, September 16, 2024 at 2:33:31 PM UTC-4 [email protected] 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Doesn't that kind of defeat the whole purpose of having an outliner?
>>>>
>>>> Strings of the pattern `<<some_token>>` occur with some frequency in 
>>>> bash scripts as well, for example:
>>>>
>>>> ```
>>>> log=/path/to/logfile.log
>>>> sftp [email protected]<<EOF>>$log
>>>>   mget *.txt
>>>>   bye
>>>> EOF
>>>> ```
>>>>
>>>> I admit, I did test that above snippet earlier, and it worked without 
>>>> issue both as a @file and an @edit, so I'm not certain what exactly is 
>>>> triggering this issue.  But I do think it's worthwhile to figure it out.
>>>>
>>>> Jake
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 2:11 PM Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 12:34 PM 'rengel' via leo-editor <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> So basically that means you can't reliably use Leo's @file nodes for 
>>>>>> Elixir adn Erlang source code?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, that's what I'm saying. @edit will usually be better than @asis.
>>>>>
>>>>> Edward
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "leo-editor" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS24H1Vei-AgxJXNj23qV_ODYtPGGvxw1T9es32-k7wNWA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS24H1Vei-AgxJXNj23qV_ODYtPGGvxw1T9es32-k7wNWA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/d86ace95-1e3f-4cd5-90a8-fe82e98cfa46n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to