On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 4:12 PM Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas < off...@riseup.net> wrote:
> > On 12/06/25 11:44, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > And I have explained why such reasons seem uncompelling. A first principle > (an axiomatic rule) can not be: someone argument's are, by principle > un-criticable. > Fair enough. But I didn't use that principle to reject the podcast! Let me repeat my assertions: - Criticisms of Turing will teach us nothing about AI as it exists today. - Criticizing historical figures using modern values is a dubious enterprise. - The Turing test in no way hindered the development of AI. So yes, I didn't state my first principles explicitly. And yes, my first post could be construed as if I was saying "someone's arguments are, by principle un-criticable". I apologize for my provocative language and lack of clarity. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS3xby5a2s4sv2_uV8xCLUM%2B8%3DNqV-foJE47fnUGzmF5mg%40mail.gmail.com.
