Thanks for sharing! Did you try to put the complete Leo codebase into an AI-based IDE like Windsurf or Google Antigravity? Then you can get a critique of the entire codebase or parts thereof or the complete documentation within the IDE and get automatic improvements (if you wish so) or suggestions for improvements. I know that this isn't the Leonine way of programming, but it might be worth a try.
On Sunday, November 23, 2025 at 3:50:57 PM UTC+1 [email protected] wrote: > D'Accord. > > On Sunday, November 23, 2025 at 7:01:20 AM UTC-5 Edward K. Ream wrote: > >> On Saturday, November 22, 2025 at 10:20:56 PM UTC-6 [email protected] >> wrote: >> >> The hardest part is how to talk about all the non-programming things that >> Leo can do or be made to do. I agreed with most of what the chatbot had to >> say, including de-emphasizing clones. I'm also a little unhappy when Leo is >> called an IDE, because these days people expect much more from IDEs than >> Leo provides, especially for non-Python programming. Yet Leo makes managing >> long, complex code bases many many times more easy and feasible than >> anything else I've tried. Leo also makes trying experimental code way >> easier than anything else (e.g., running a script to test out some >> programming issue). So hard to capture the flavor of all that! >> >> I use Leo every day, all the time, for non-programming things. I don't >> see how I could replace it if it somehow vanished. >> >> >> Thomas, I've added a slightly edited version of this quote to Leo's home >> page. >> >> Edward >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/cf436d5c-9704-4288-86b7-9fd1153d336dn%40googlegroups.com.
