On Wednesday, May 13, 2026 at 6:50:42 PM UTC-4 [email protected] wrote:

Just my two cents on my position about all this "agentic programming 
fashionware", I don't want to delegate big parts of my understanding of 
complex systems, including software, to non-deterministic systems that 
"hallucinate" in non detectable ways. I try to confine the stuff I don't 
understand about the software artifacts I build to small parts, where I ask 
specific questions to the AI (or Apparent Intelligence, as I like to call 
it) and do small commits.

I keep my tokens usage small, use anonymous AI systems like duck.ai or 
Lumo, that don't use my data for training and I think that in all that rush 
of AI, seems a minimalist approach with little compromise.

I doubtful and worried of a grandiloquent visions with a 
unique convergent future for diverse people and worldviews, particularly 
when it comes from tech bros. Unfortunately "agentic programming" seems one 
of such visions.

A friend just returned a book  that I loaned her before the COVID-19 
pandemic upended so much of civic life: *Stand on Zanzibar*, by John 
Brunner. Seeing it brought to mind one of Brunner's creations for the book: 
Shalmaneser, a supercomputer that does work that greatly benefits giant 
corporations. The Wikipedia article on the book 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stand_on_Zanzibar> mentions published praise 
of the novel: 

In his 2021 book *Doom: The Politics of Catastrophe*, historian Niall 
Ferguson lauds *Stand on Zanzibar* for foreseeing the future better than 
more popular novels such as *Fahrenheit 451*, *The Handmaid's Tale* and 
*Anthem*.

[Wikipedia article quotation of Ferguson begins]

*Yet, on further reflection, none of these authors truly foresaw all the 
peculiarities of our networked world, which has puzzlingly combined a 
rising speed and penetration of consumer information technology with a 
slackening of progress in other areas, such as nuclear energy, and a woeful 
degeneration of governance. The real prophets turn out, on closer 
inspection, to be less familiar figures—for example, John Brunner, whose 
Stand on Zanzibar (1968) is set in 2010, at a time when population pressure 
has led to widening social divisions and political extremism. Despite the 
threat of terrorism, U.S. corporations like General Technics are booming, 
thanks to a supercomputer named Shalmaneser. China is America's new rival. 
Europe has united. Brunner also foresees affirmative action, genetic 
engineering, Viagra, Detroit's collapse, satellite TV, in-flight video, gay 
marriage, laser printing, electric cars, the de-criminalization of 
marijuana, and the decline of tobacco. There is even a progressive 
president (albeit of Beninia, not America) named "Obomi".*[End of quotation]

I recommend reading *Stand on Zanzibar*, it is an astonishing experiment in 
form, written to immerse the reader rather than argue in a manner suited to 
debate - it introduces the technique used ("The Innis Mode") as a necessity 
of urgency. . . . which is sobering to the reader approaching it in 2026, 
since it was published in 1968. In addition to the other forecasts made in 
the novel, Shalmaneser is sure to strike the current reader as a single 
Artificial Intelligence. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/c6172cc5-5b91-4e8e-a2e3-fac9679cd0d2n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to