Leonardo Zide wrote: > Every once in a while I update the linux version and get it > working again but it isn't the main platform anymore. I keep a Linux > virtual machine around just for fixing LeoCAD, so usually when you > see a check in named "Linux fixes" it means that it's a version that > works. Keep in mind that usually the trunk is really unstable (as it > is right now with all the new features) so if you only want to fix > small things you might want to try the latest stable label instead. > > The Linux GUI is lacking a few minor things but it works. I'm not > attached to that code at all, I would also have written a lot of > things differently now with more programming experience. What do you > want to change? > > > On Jul 22, 2007, at 7:52 PM, Gary Kramlich wrote: > >> First off, I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask these but I >> didn't see a devel list. >> >> Anyways, I'm interested in using leocad on linux. I'm also willing to >> get it working on linux. However, I don't want to step on anyone's >> toes, and was wondering how actively developed the linux version >> is? If >> it's not actively maintained, how tied to the code are you? I've >> dug a >> bit and seen a lot I'd change. >> >> Anyways, thanks in advance. >> >> -- >> Gary Kramlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I tried the 0.74 and 0.75 tags, both failed to compile, however, I didn't get around to testing one of the "linux fixes" revs. When it comes to changes, it'd basically be a lot of cleanup. Mostly because leocad is C++, I'd move it to using gtkmm instead of using the C bindings for starters. I don't have much experience with gtkmm but am confident I can figure it out. Aside from that, just basic cleanups and maintenance as needed. -- Gary Kramlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Leocad mailing list [email protected] https://list.gerf.org/listinfo/leocad
