Gary Kramlich wrote:
> Leonardo Zide wrote:
>>    Every once in a while I update the linux version and get it  
>> working again but it isn't the main platform anymore. I keep a Linux  
>> virtual machine around just for fixing LeoCAD, so usually when you  
>> see a check in named "Linux fixes" it means that it's a version that  
>> works. Keep in mind that usually the trunk is really unstable (as it  
>> is right now with all the new features) so if you only want to fix  
>> small things you might want to try the latest stable label instead.
>>
>>    The Linux GUI is lacking a few minor things but it works. I'm not  
>> attached to that code at all, I would also have written a lot of  
>> things differently now with more programming experience. What do you  
>> want to change?
>>
>>
>> On Jul 22, 2007, at 7:52 PM, Gary Kramlich wrote:
>>
>>> First off, I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask these but I
>>> didn't see a devel list.
>>>
>>> Anyways, I'm interested in using leocad on linux.  I'm also willing to
>>> get it working on linux.  However, I don't want to step on anyone's
>>> toes, and was wondering how actively developed the linux version  
>>> is?  If
>>> it's not actively maintained, how tied to the code are you?  I've  
>>> dug a
>>> bit and seen a lot I'd change.
>>>
>>> Anyways, thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Gary Kramlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> I tried the 0.74 and 0.75 tags, both failed to compile, however, I 
> didn't get around to testing one of the "linux fixes" revs.
> 
> When it comes to changes, it'd basically be a lot of cleanup.  Mostly 
> because leocad is C++, I'd move it to using gtkmm instead of using the C 
> bindings for starters.  I don't have much experience with gtkmm but am 
> confident I can figure it out.  Aside from that, just basic cleanups and 
> maintenance as needed.
> 

Sorry about replying to myself, but rev 675 doesn't work on amd64 
either, I can fix most of it, but I'm not sure how to handle this:

linux/dialogs.cpp:2957: error: ‘Object’ was not declared in this scope

-- 
Gary Kramlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

_______________________________________________
Leocad mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.gerf.org/listinfo/leocad

Reply via email to