Good plan, I like that - if the MFC conversion is easier, and the MFC version is more feature full, then this may be a place to start. Considering each system specific version has its own dir, as Leonardo suggests, you do not even need to branch for it. Nice. If I get a chance (albeit I may not for a while), I will pitch in on that. Perhaps if some of the tasks could be made as trac tickets on the gerf.org site, then I can cherrypick one or two to have a crack at.
Leonardo - do you have test scripts (even manual scripts) for Leocad? If not, maybe I can take a look at creating some for you and putting them on the wiki or unit tests in the repo. Cheers, Danny 2008/7/27 Henrik Sundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I've run some of the Qt tutorials today. Very nice. > I started to make a .pro (Qt project) file for Leocad. > > Migration from Mfc to Qt is described, but not from Gtk, and there are > tools for converting Mfc resources to Qt. > > Is the linux-version far behind the windows version? I.e. would it not > only be a greater effort, but also give a poorer result, if the gtk > version is used as source? > > And does the trunk differ to much from 0.75, making it difficult to merge? > > /$ > _______________________________________________ > Leocad mailing list > [email protected] > https://list.gerf.org/listinfo/leocad > -- Danny Staple OrionRobots http://orionrobots.co.uk/blogs/dannystaple (Full contact details available through website) _______________________________________________ Leocad mailing list [email protected] https://list.gerf.org/listinfo/leocad
