On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 08:00 +0100, danny staple wrote: > Good plan, > > I like that - if the MFC conversion is easier, and the MFC version is > more feature full, then this may be a place to start. Considering each > system specific version has its own dir, as Leonardo suggests, you do > not even need to branch for it. Nice. If I get a chance (albeit I may > not for a while), I will pitch in on that. Perhaps if some of the > tasks could be made as trac tickets on the gerf.org site, then I can > cherrypick one or two to have a crack at. > > Leonardo - do you have test scripts (even manual scripts) for Leocad? > If not, maybe I can take a look at creating some for you and putting > them on the wiki or unit tests in the repo. > > Cheers, > Danny >
alternatively, you could try GtkMM (the c++ binding) > 2008/7/27 Henrik Sundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I've run some of the Qt tutorials today. Very nice. > > I started to make a .pro (Qt project) file for Leocad. > > > > Migration from Mfc to Qt is described, but not from Gtk, and there are > > tools for converting Mfc resources to Qt. > > > > Is the linux-version far behind the windows version? I.e. would it not > > only be a greater effort, but also give a poorer result, if the gtk > > version is used as source? > > > > And does the trunk differ to much from 0.75, making it difficult to merge? > > > > /$ > > _______________________________________________ > > Leocad mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://list.gerf.org/listinfo/leocad > > > > > _______________________________________________ Leocad mailing list [email protected] https://list.gerf.org/listinfo/leocad
