I wonder if you could build .rpms or .debs on travis-ci?

At the very least, if you have unit tests, you can run them on Travis-CI…

http://about.travis-ci.org/docs/user/languages/cpp/

Leo:

I have some experience with Travis.  I couldn't set up the hooks (I don't have 
access to the SVN server) but I could help with the rest.

Ciao!

On Jul 9, 2013, at 6:06 PM, Leonardo Zide <[email protected]> wrote:

> Regarding repos: If anyone wants to package it for a different distro I'll be 
> happy to help just like I helped with the Debian package by making changes 
> and integrating patches.
> 
> The goal for the next version is to have matching Linux and Windows (and 
> maybe OSX) versions and have all features from 0.79 working. I think the Qt 
> version is already better than the GTK version but it's still missing a few 
> features from the MFC version. I'm not adding any new features but I spent 
> some time rearranging dialogs that were too confusing (like the keyboard 
> shortcuts and parts categories).
> 
> The only major feature missing is printing, which is already half implemented 
> (print preview works except for text) but I still have to go through all MFC 
> files and make sure I ported everything and then I'll have to test all 
> features and look for bugs.
> 
> I have no idea how long that's going to take but I'd rather take more time to 
> release something complete than to rush it and deal with bugs.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Nicolas Guilbert <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 09:56:03 PM Leonardo Zide wrote:
> >
> >   Currently the Qt version is about 80% done so it may be a little too
> > early for bug reports but if you're interested in checking it out: 'svn co
> > http://svn.leocad.org/branches/qtest'. It does have 3ds export, keyboard
> > shortcuts and toolbar docking on Linux but still missing context menus.
> >
> 
> The split view is awesome :)
> 
> The export to HTML is actually producing images.
> 
> For the Linux version this seems like a quite significant improvement - are
> there any known regressions compared to 0.79.3?
> 
> Do you have an idea about the release date?
> 
> 
>  Nicolas
> 
> --
> Nicolas Guilbert
> Debian Maintainer for Leocad
> _______________________________________________
> Leocad mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://list.gerf.org/listinfo/leocad
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leocad mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://list.gerf.org/listinfo/leocad

_______________________________________________
Leocad mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.gerf.org/listinfo/leocad

Reply via email to