Sorry, hit send by mistake. Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Are your issues happening on a 64 bit platform? There are some 64 bit > related patches in fedora that may not be in cvs. Nope, this is 32 bit x86. > And yes, lesstif seems to me to be abandonware, but I guess that what > would be needed for a fork would be developpers. If you are willing to > do a fork, maybe you could instead ask the current maintainers for > commit rights. >From my investigation of the sources, fixing them is first of all immensely difficult and second, a huge task. I use two pieces of software that depends on Motif; Nedit and mgdiff. I am already really close to replacing mgdiff with something that works better and uses GTK+. That just leaves Nedit and as much as I love Nedit, I can't imagine putting in the effort required to fix it, just for the sake of keeping Nedit. I actually think fixing lesstif/Nedit would be more difficult (and less enjoyable) than writing a new editor from scratch using Ocaml and lablgtk. Erik -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo ----------------------------------------------------------------- "We can build a better product than Linux" -- Microsoft Corp.'s Windows operating-system chief, Jim Allchin. One has to wonder why, with their huge resources, they haven't. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ Lesstif-discuss mailing list Lesstif-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lesstif-discuss