Sorry, hit send by mistake.

Patrice Dumas wrote:

> Are your issues happening on a 64 bit platform? There are some 64 bit
> related patches in fedora that may not be in cvs.

Nope, this is 32 bit x86.
 
> And yes, lesstif seems to me to be abandonware, but I guess that what
> would be needed for a fork would be developpers. If you are willing to
> do a fork, maybe you could instead ask the current maintainers for
> commit rights.

>From my investigation of the sources, fixing them is first of all
immensely difficult and second, a huge task.

I use two pieces of software that depends on Motif; Nedit and mgdiff.
I am already really close to replacing mgdiff with something that
works better and uses GTK+.

That just leaves Nedit and as much as I love Nedit, I can't imagine
putting in the effort required to fix it, just for the sake of keeping
Nedit. I actually think fixing lesstif/Nedit would be more difficult
(and less enjoyable) than writing a new editor from scratch using Ocaml
and lablgtk.

Erik
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"We can build a better product than Linux" -- Microsoft
Corp.'s Windows operating-system chief, Jim Allchin.
One has to wonder why, with their huge resources, they haven't.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
Lesstif-discuss mailing list
Lesstif-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lesstif-discuss

Reply via email to