Hi, > We like to know what we're changing; the patch on your web site > does more than changing i18n in XmText/XmTextField. Maybe that's > described in the document, unfortunately I can't read Japanese. > There's fixes to List.c which definitely don't improve i18n. Sorry, there are no document about changes yet. I will put comments into code. Current patch includes the below changes. - i18n support(for XmTextWidget, XmTextFieldWidget) - Improve Highlighting especially MULTILINE_TEXT. - Improve text selection(Cut & Paste) - Fixes some issues related to Netscape(dynMotif Version) And I am also trying to improve DnD behavior now... > The things I'd like to see changed are : > - we like to stick to the data structures that we currently have; > they closely resemble the ones in Motif, we'd like to avoid > adding fields. Your code adds a couple of fields (max_char_width, > fontset); my question is would it be possible to work without them. > - There are a couple of global variables in XmIm.c. I *definitely* > don't like that :-) > > So to summarise : we *do* want your fixes; we'd like them to obey > some rules, please help us get there... > > Did I say "thank you" yet ? :-) OK. I will try that my changes satisfy Lesstif's law:-) However, I am just a Sunday programmer. So, I need the time (4W or more)to do that. Thanks. -- Kazuyuki
