On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Alexander Mai wrote:
> Well, I couldn't find the last thread about XTHREADS so I raise the
> issue again: one problem was that appearently we check using
> _XtProcessLock() for XTHREADed libs, why don't we use
> XtToolkitThreadInitialize? The first doesn't work on Digital un*x (and
> probably on others as well). We should finally get this done, since
> this would help LessTif on this platform very much. If I want to test
> it now, I always patch Vendor.c to get the right code selected.
Testing for the existence of XtToolkitThreadInitialize is not enough. The
result must be tested too, since even in non thread-aware implementations
the function exists, though it ever returns False.
--
Carlos A. M. dos Santos
Federal University of Pelotas Meteorological Research Center
Av. Ildefonso Simoes Lopes 2791 Pelotas, RS, Brasil, CEP 96060-290
WWW: http://www.cpmet.ufpel.tche.br RENPAC (X.25): 153231641
Phone: +55 53 277-6767 FAX: +55 53 277-6722
