Forgot to mention some things
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 05:55:13AM -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
> On 12-Sep-00 at 05:19, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 09:46:54PM -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
> > > I finally got around to getting openMotif to compile on my box. Okay, I
> > > had to #if 0 out a wack of stuff dealing with XICProc's, whatever they
> > > are, so these results may be tainted a bit. Anyway, here is what I
> > > found......
> > > With LessTif
> > > we fail 63 out of 555 tests
> > >
> > > With openMotif
> > > we fail 92 out of 519 tests
> > >
> > > So to start 36 of the tests did not even compile under openMotif. Correct
> > > me if I'm wrong Jon, all of the tests have compiled, and run, under some
> > > version of Motif 1.2.
> > >
> > > Unfortunatly, all is not rosy.....We are segfaulting on _alot_ of tests
> > > that we never used to!!!!!! For example, textf/test8!!!!! Simply
> > > creating and destroying a damn TextField, we are now segfaulting!!!!
Fixed.
Seems it was the patch which I applied earlier (well, not my patch, but my
fault not to run checks on it probably)
Now trying at least to locate the filesb problem.
> Also
> > > filesb test11, 12, an 13!!!! This is just damn depressing...... A hell of
> > > a lot of time and effort have gone into the tests over _many_ years, and
> > > for what?? It seems that they are not being used anymore.....
> > >
> > > So much for improvements.....the next step needs to be going back and get
> > > running that which ran before......sigh.....
The tests are helpful, but if not running from a test facility like you did
earlier things are more difficult perhaps.
Ok, what about me?
- my OS/2 port is still based on some manual written Makefiles
test/ is not supported yet ...
- my linux box is too weak to make running testall real fun :-(
- my DU box: well, here I build the tests and run some. Not regularly though.
WRT Motif tests: I also only built single ones, I even don't know if there's
a generic Makefile target for building all Motif tests?
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
