On 13-Mar-01 at 17:46, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:22:53 -0500 (EST), Rick Scott wrote:
>
> >frame/test9 Not bad, off by a couple pixels
> >label/test14 May be a 2.0 vs 1.2 thing
> >list/test18
> >list/test8
> >mainw/test16
> >panedw/test8
> >panedw/test9 New memory leak
> >text/test11 New memory leak
> >
> >On the bright side
> >
> >drawnbutton/test10
> >label/test12
> >selectionbox/test9
> >
> >seem to be passing now.....
> >
>
> Well, I digged out a list of all memory leak checks and gave
> them a try on my OS/2 box with Xm 2.1:
> all are reported to have no leak.
>
> Same for you?
I do remember some leaks using openMotif in areas using XIM, that seemed to be
caused by the lower level libraries. Specically something in XmList. So do take
our leak tests with a "grain of salt". We are relying on a lot of underlying
stuff to be leak free.
>
>
> ---
> Alexander Mai
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lesstif-commits mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lesstif-commits
>
>
