Alexander Mai wrote:
> 
> Webdesign is not our main focus, but I think to
> some extent we can improve our existing pages.
> So I created a frame'd version which is currently in testing
> on
>   http://lesstif.sourceforge.net/frames.html
> 
> In fact the frames are not used to split the
> content of our webpages, we just add some additional
> links and try to get a consistent style for our pages.
> So we will certainly stay (or will again be) browsable
> for browsers which don't support frames. However even
> our beloved tools like lynx/links do meanwhile support
> them quite well.
> 
> It would be nice if some people would have a quick look
> and could comment on major problems. Minor issues are not
> worthwile to report since at least a couple of
> cosmetical changes are still scheduled.
> 
> --
> Alexander Mai
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, I will tone down my hatred for forms for just a _few_ minutes.
1. it is _slightly_ more dificult to grab a the link  to send someone a link
to a specific page because the page you are looking at is not the link shown
in the "location" bar of your GUI browser.

2. If you do send someone a link to a specific page, and they go directly to
it vs navigating the frames it will look different than what the orginating
person was looking at:
http://lesstif.sourceforge.net/download.html
vs
http://lesstif.sourceforge.net/frames.html ->Downloads  ->Download Page

3. It is very anoying when you go from one site (with frames) to another
groups site and still have the frames from the first place.
http://lesstif.sourceforge.net/frames.html ->Downloads ->CD-ROM vendors
->Debian

4. I have seen very few frames sites which will not confuse the browser when
printing.

Note: I do use Netscape Comunicator almost exclusivly so some (but not all) of
this may be caused by the specific browser.

Sorry Alexander.
Please at least always provide a frames free set as well, it keeps people like
me less anoying. :)

-- 
______________________________________________________________________________
Todd Denniston, Code 6067, NSWC Crane mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd crawl over an acre of 'Visual This++' and 'Integrated Development
That' to get to gcc, Emacs, and gdb.  Thank you.
        -- Vance Petree, Virginia Power

Reply via email to