Jud is right.
The Speakeasy mail servers do EXACTLY the same thing, I can assure
you! The RFC's dictate this, not Speakeasy. And Speakeasy KNOWS this
I'm very sure!
Ask them how their own mail servers for their client accounts are set
to handle these? There is no difference in regard to how mail servers
and list servers handle mail rejections?
They won't be able to do any better than you... period! Sure its
spam, but there is NOTHING you or they can do about it for either
your list server or their mail server! This has been a headache for
ALL email services for YEARS and is not new!
Ron
On May 7, 2007, at 12:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A couple of things:
1) Again, is Speakeasy talking to you about the content of the
messages in
their spam trap, or is it just the fact that messages end up in
there? If
it is the latter, this change won't help you. Subscribe requests will
result in replies that end up in the same spot.
2) RE: Spam engine. All of those messages will end up in a reply to
the
person that sent the mail (or that Letterrip thinks sent the mail).
You
are not redistributing SPAM. Letterrip is rejecting it. This is
exactly
the same behavior that any other mail server would do.
The one idea that came out of this would be to handle failures with
SMTP
errors rather then sending replies.
--
This message is from the Letterrip-Talk Mailing list.
To unsubscribe, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/letterrip-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/
