On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Randy McMurchy wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote these words on 08/14/05 17:20 CST: > > Version update for shadow, maybe correct this time > > Maybe, but maybe-not. :-) > Well, it was less incorrect - I think I managed to do all the files the second time :-o
> Here are some suggestions, offered in the spirit of helpfulness. > Thanks. Mostly done in r6688, but I disagree about the second 'shadow': it is part of "shadow group functionality" rather than referring to the package name. Ken -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
