Ken Moffat wrote these words on 08/14/05 18:30 CST: > Thanks. Mostly done in r6688, but I disagree about the second > 'shadow': it is part of "shadow group functionality" rather than > referring to the package name.
Disagreeing is cool. However, I fail to see what "shadow group functionality" is, if 'shadow' is not being used in a proper noun situation. Isn't it the package Shadow's group functionality? To me, the way you have it written is that it is Shadow's group functionality. However, leaving out the possessive could be optional, I suppose. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 18:33:01 up 134 days, 18:06, 3 users, load average: 0.01, 0.24, 0.61 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
